[NYTr] Dowd: Hey, W! Bin Laden's Still After Your Ass

nytr at olm.blythe-systems.com nytr at olm.blythe-systems.com
Tue Jul 24 12:20:43 EDT 2007


The New York Times - Jul 18, 2007
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/07/18/opinion/18dowd.html


Hey, W! Bin Laden (Still) Determined to Strike in U.S.

By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON

Oh, as it turns out, they’re not on the run.

And, oh yeah, they can fight us here even if we fight them there.

And oh, one more thing, after spending hundreds of billions and losing
all those lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, we’re more vulnerable to
terrorists than ever.

And, um, you know that Dead-or-Alive stuff? We may be the ones who end
up dead.

Squirming White House officials had to confront the fact yesterday that
everything President Bush has been spouting the last six years about Al
Qaeda being on the run, disrupted and weakened was just guff.

Last year, W. called his “personal friend” Gen. Pervez Musharraf “a
strong defender of freedom.” Unfortunately, it turned out to be Al
Qaeda’s freedom. The White House is pinning the blame on Pervez.

While the administration lavishes billions on Pakistan, including $750
million in a risible attempt to win “hearts and minds” in tribal areas
where Al Qaeda leaders are hiding and training, President Musharraf has
helped create a quiet mountain retreat, a veritable terrorism spa, for
Osama and Ayman al-Zawahiri to refresh themselves and get back in shape.

The administration’s most thorough intelligence assessment since 9/11
is stark and dark. Two pages add up to one message: The Bushies blew
it. Al Qaeda has exploded into a worldwide state of mind. Because of
what’s going on with Iraq and Iran, Hezbollah may now “be more likely
to consider” attacking us. Al Qaeda will try to “put operatives here” —
(some news reports say a cell from Pakistan already is en route or has
arrived) — and “acquire and employ chemical, biological, radiological
or nuclear material in attacks.”

(Democrats on cots are ineffectual, but Al Qaeda in caves gets the job
done?)

After 9/11, W. stopped mentioning Osama’s name, calling him “just a
person who’s now been marginalized,” and adding “I just don’t spend
that much time on him.”

This week, as counterterrorism officials gathered at the White House to
frantically brainstorm on covert and overt plans to capture Osama, the
president may have regretted his perverse attempt to demote America’s
most determined enemy.

W. began to mention Osama and Al Qaeda more recently, but only to
assert: “The same folks that are bombing innocent people in Iraq were
the ones who attacked us in America on September the 11th.” His
conflation is contradicted by the fact that Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, as
the Sunni terrorist group in Iraq is known, did not exist before 9/11.

Fran Townsend, the president’s homeland security adviser, did her best
to put a gloss on the dross but failed. She had to admit that the
hands-off approach used by Mr. Musharraf with the tribal leaders in
North Waziristan, which always looked like a nutty way to give Al Qaeda
room to regroup, was a nutty way to give Al Qaeda room to regroup.

“It hasn’t worked for Pakistan,” she conceded. “It hasn’t worked for
the United States.”

Just as we outsourced capturing Osama at Tora Bora to Afghans who had
no motive to do it, we outsourced capturing Osama in Pakistan to Mr.
Musharraf, who had no motive to do it.

Pressed by reporters on why we haven’t captured Osama, especially if
he’s climbing around with a dialysis machine, Ms. Townsend sniffed that
she wished “it were that easy.” It’s not easy to launch a trumped-up
war to reshape the Middle East into a utopian string of democracies,
but that didn’t stop W. from making that audacious gambit.

The Bushies, who once mocked Bill Clinton for doing only “pinprick”
bombings on Al Qaeda, now say they can do nothing about Osama because
they can’t “pinpoint” him, as Ms. Townsend put it. She assured
reporters that they were “harassing” Al Qaeda, making it sound more
like a tugging-on-pigtails strategy than a take-no-prisoners strategy.

We’ve had it up the wazir with Waziristan. Surely there are Army
Rangers and Navy Seals who can make the trek, even if it’s a no-man’s
land. If it were a movie, we’d trace the saline in Osama’s dialysis
machine, target it with a laser and blow up the mountain.

W. swaggers about with his cowboy boots and gunslinger stance. But when
talking about Waziristan last February, he explained that it was hard
to round up the Taliban and Al Qaeda leaders there because: “This is
wild country; this is wilder than the Wild West.”

Yes, they shoot with real bullets up there, and they fly into buildings
with real planes.

If W. were a real cowboy, instead of somebody who just plays one on TV,
he would have cleaned up Dodge by now.

Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company



More information about the NYTr mailing list