[NYTr] Drug War Outrages: Man served 10-yr sentence for selling light bulbs

All the News That Doesn't Fit nytr at blythe-systems.com
Sat Aug 25 23:04:59 EDT 2007


ent by taimonds (activ-l) - Aug 25, 2007

Creative Loafing Atlanta
http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10762

Forgotten Man

Steve Tucker served a 10-year prison sentence for selling light bulbs.
Is America's drug war worth it?

By Scott Henry

A year has passed since Steve Tucker made his unheralded return to
Atlanta.

His one-bedroom flat, tucked into a sprawling Sandy Springs apartment
complex, is furnished sparsely: a recliner, TV, computer and a small,
picnic-style table that serves as both dining hutch and desk. The stark
white static of the walls is interrupted only by three small, web-like
dream catchers tacked to the Sheetrock.

It's the sort of Spartan minimalism one might expect of someone who,
until recently, had to content himself with staring at bare cinderblock.

"Watch out, you're talking to a notorious ex-con." Wrapped in a sharp
Middle Georgia twang, Tucker's voice betrays a suppressed smile. The
slight, balding, 50-year-old Atlantan is hardly an intimidating figure.

But he's only half-kidding. Nearly a decade ago, he was sent to prison
as a result of a once-infamous federal drug case that sparked national
outrage for its rough interpretation of justice.

In the spring of 1994, the Tucker family received lengthy prison
sentences -- 10 years for Steve, 16 years for his older brother Gary,
and 10 years for his brother's wife, Joanne -- without possibility of
parole, for the curiously worded federal crime of "conspiracy to
manufacture marijuana."

Yet federal prosecutors never charged them with buying, selling,
growing, transporting, smoking or even possessing marijuana. An
18-month DEA investigation had failed to turn up direct evidence
connecting the Tuckers to even a single joint.

Instead, they were locked away for selling the lamps, fertilizer and
gardening hardware from the small hydroponic supply shop Gary operated
on Buford Highway that enabled their customers to grow pot.

In the mid-'90s, the Tucker case became a cause celebre among
libertarian activists and other advocates of marijuana legalization. It
served as an oft-cited, cautionary example of the runaway powers of the
federal government and the worst excesses of the War on Drugs.

And yet, in the long years since, the Tucker case has faded from the
radar. No TV cameras or microphones awaited Steve Tucker when he finally
shed his prison uniform and came home.

His mother would rather it remain that way. "I'm just scared to death of
the federal government," she says. At the same time, Doris Gore realizes
her son has an important story to tell.

And he's determined to tell it. As he reads weekly accounts of federal
agents in California arresting licensed medical-marijuana growers, he's
convinced he must speak out.

"The feds don't like it when you buck them, but I'll be damned if they
break me," Tucker says. "What kind of American would I be if I just kept
my mouth shut?"

Steve Tucker's nightmare began with the American dream.

The funny thing is, the dream initially belonged to his older brother
Gary, a balding Vietnam veteran with a house in the suburbs and a
comfortable marriage. For nearly two decades, he and Steve had worked
side-by-side, installing commercial fire-control systems for a Buckhead
company. But by the fall of 1987, Gary was 40 and he yearned to be his
own boss.

Gary's choice of businesses was pioneering: a store devoted to
hydroponics, the technique of growing plants without soil or sunlight,
using only powerful lamps, chemical nutrients and a self-contained
irrigation system. It was, Gary decided after some research, the "wave
of the future."

Whose future, however, was the question. While hydroponics is highly
effective at boosting vegetable growth, the systems are so costly as to
be of practical use only to orchid breeders. And, of course, to
marijuana growers, who are lured by the promise of high yields that
could be produced in basements and attics, away from the prying eyes of
authorities.

Gary wasn't naive. He knew his customer base would include few
deep-pocketed tomato enthusiasts. But just as Wal-Mart doesn't ask if
the handgun ammunition it sells will be used for target practice or
hold-ups, the Tuckers decided it was best to adopt a "don't ask, don't
tell" policy.

"Look, we weren't stupid," Steve says with a weary smile. "We figured a
percentage of our customers were growing pot. But we had store rules
that if anyone asked us about marijuana, we'd ask them to leave. What
someone was planning to do with fertilizer or grow lights wasn't our
concern. Most of the stuff we were selling, you could buy at Home
Depot. We had a legitimate business."

To finance the start-up, Gary mortgaged his home in Gwinnett and, in the
spring of 1988, his business opened in a small shopping center on the
edge of Norcross. It was the first hydroponics store in Georgia.

The name Gary chose for his store -- Southern Lights And Hydroponics --
was a nod to a successful Mid-Atlantic chain called Northern Lights,
which itself was named after a particularly potent strain of Alaskan
weed.

Steve, who had begun making child-support payments after his 10-year
marriage ended in divorce, kept his regular job, but helped out weekends
in his brother's store. Joanne, who worked for an insurance company,
kept her husband's books.

To compensate for hydroponics' somewhat questionable image, Gary
wouldn't allow High Times, rolling papers or Mr. Natural posters to be
sold in the store. Any product or packaging that arrived bearing the
familiar hemp-leaf silhouette would promptly be shipped back. Adding to
Southern Lights' air of respectability, the brothers were invited to
install working hydroponic exhibits for the agriculture departments of
Gwinnett Tech and a local high school.

That's not to say the Tucker brothers didn't enjoy a joint now and
again. Gary had first smoked during his tour in Vietnam and Steve would
get arrested in 1991 for growing his own stash at home. For that
offense, he would serve six months in a county work-release program.

"Getting busted was just my dumb luck," Steve explains. "I used to smoke
pot, but I wasn't dealing. I never claimed to be 100-percent innocent,
but I never conspired with anybody to do anything illegal."

What the Tuckers didn't know while they were busy preparing to launch
Southern Lights was that, in Washington, the DEA was grappling with how
to go after the booming number of marijuana growers who were taking
their crops indoors to avoid aerial detection.

A veteran agent had hit on the answer while flipping through an issue of
High Times: Cut the burgeoning industry's supply lines by focusing the
agency's attack on stores selling grow lights and hydroponic gear,
dozens of which advertised in the pages of head-shop magazines.

Over the next two years, the DEA subpoenaed UPS shipping records for
stores across the country. Agents went undercover to browse through
hydroponic shops, follow up leads on pot farms and casually ask everyone
with long hair where one could buy seeds.

The agency's aggressiveness showed how far the pendulum had swung since
the heyday of the marijuana-reform movement, a decade earlier. At the
close of the '70s, 11 states -- following the advice of the American
Medical Association and even then-President Jimmy Carter -- had
decriminalized simple possession. In 1981, the first bill to legalize
medical-marijuana use was introduced in Congress. Its lead sponsor was a
young, conservative Georgia lawmaker named Newt Gingrich.

Under Ronald Reagan, however, the tide swiftly turned. Even while the
CIA was secretly helping Nicaraguan Contras smuggle vast amounts of
cocaine into the president's home state of California, the
administration was cracking down on domestic pot smokers, pushing for
"zero tolerance" drug laws and scolding Americans to "Just Say No." By
the end of the '80s, even socially progressive Oregon had again
outlawed weed.

One month after the first President Bush pledged to escalate the War on
Drugs in a Sept. 5, 1989, speech televised from the Oval Office,
Operation Green Merchant went public. More than 200 indoor growing
operations and 30 indoor-gardening shops and mail-order houses found
themselves overrun with DEA agents.

One high-profile businessman caught in that first wave of busts was Tom
Alexander, the owner of a small hydroponics store in Oregon and
publisher of Sinsemilla Tips, considered by some marijuana advocates to
be the thinking-man's High Times.

The DEA seized an estimated $55,000 in inventory from his store, but
Alexander soon discovered it would be even more costly to fight the
action in court. A few months later, he was forced to shutter his
magazine as well.

Alexander had been financially ruined without ever being charged with a
crime. It was an approach the feds would repeat with indoor-gardening
stores from coast to coast, including all six locations of Northern
Lights.

So perhaps Gary Tucker shouldn't have been surprised one day in the
early weeks of 1992 when DEA Special Agent Kevin McLaughlin dropped by
Southern Lights with an offer its owner wasn't expected to refuse. The
feds would be much obliged, McLaughlin explained, if he'd let them
install hidden cameras in the store so they could snoop on his
customers. If he didn't, no effort would be spared in shutting down his
4-year-old business.

The conversation lasted probably all of five minutes, but its outcome
would set into motion forces the Tuckers could scarcely imagine.

Gary would later tell his family that when he told McLaughlin to get
lost, the agent "said they'd get him somehow," recalls his mother,
Doris Gore.

Still disgusted by the idea of being pressured into being a government
spy, Steve has never second-guessed his brother's response. "This isn't
Nazi Germany," he says.

Sometime in late spring 1992, Gary Tucker realized his shop was being
watched by a man sitting at a desk in an empty storefront across the
street. Every time a car pulled into the Southern Lights parking lot,
the mystery man would scribble something into a pad. From that point on,
events unfolded quickly.

In May, Mike and Andrea Williams, customers who had become friends of
Gary and Joanne, were busted by the DEA. The couple used a hydroponic
system to grow marijuana for Mike, who was terminally ill and smoked to
combat the pain and nausea.

One evening in July, the DEA's McLaughlin, accompanied by partner Mark
Hadaway, paid a visit to Jorene Deakle, who worked with Gary as Southern
Lights' store manager, and accused her and her husband of growing pot in
their home.

Deakle testified two years later at the Tuckers' sentencing hearing that
the agents had threatened to file charges and seize her house unless she
agreed to spy on her employer for them. She said she was frightened into
giving them names of Southern Lights customers she thought might be
growing weed.

But the agents wouldn't let up, she testified, until she came with them
to point out a house where she knew marijuana was being grown. As they
were driving, Deakle told the judge, she picked a house at random so
they finally would leave her alone.

The terrified Deakle called the agents several times a week to feed them
tidbits of information; the investigation gained momentum. Agents
followed customers home, pawed through their garbage, subpoenaed their
utility bills and trained sophisticated infrared-imaging devices on
their houses to look for concentrated heat sources.

Then the busts began in earnest, as one green thumb after another was
caught red-handed. Don Switlick, a convicted drug trafficker, was found
growing 114 plants with hydroponic equipment purchased at Southern
Lights. Agents discovered a grow room in the Dawsonville home of Thomas
Fordham, a high-school friend of Gary's. And, in September, Chuck
Rothermel, who ran a car-customizing shop, was busted for a large crop
of immature plants hidden in a nondescript warehouse he was renting in
Forsyth County.

Of course, not every raid paid off. In one case, agents searched a
startled family's home, only to discover that the husband was using the
incriminating high-watt lamps in his tropical aquarium. In another, the
suspect had never heard of the store; he'd been identified through his
car, which his girlfriend had borrowed for the day.

Suffering from what Steve describes as a "nervous breakdown," Deakle
mysteriously quit her job. The Tuckers would later find out she had also
broken off contact with the DEA.

By October, Gary had adopted what could only be called an unusual
business strategy, warning everyone who came into his store that they
were being watched by federal agents. "We felt it was our obligation,"
Steve explains.

Gary even complained to the newspaper -- somewhat naively, in retrospect
-- that the DEA was harassing customers buying legal products in an
effort to drive him out of business.

McLaughlin responded by dropping by the store on occasion to remind the
Tuckers of his promise to shut them down, Steve says. "He was always
real cocky," he recalls. "Once, Joanne put him down, so he told her
he'd killed her dog, just to upset her."

Their mother begged Gary to quit the hydroponics trade. "I wanted them
to get rid of that store, but Gary said they weren't doing anything
illegal," Doris Gore recalls. "He was adamant about keeping it open
because he said it wasn't his business what other people did with the
equipment he sold."

In December, Gary and Joanne went out to dinner and drinks with a
friend, Mark Holmes, who kept steering the rambling, margarita-fueled
conversation back to the subject of recreational marijuana use -- in
large part because he was wearing a wire.

The DEA raided the Tuckers' home and store the following spring,
carrying away boxes of business records, address books, photographs and
various bric-a-brac. Southern Lights was padlocked, its entire
inventory seized, and the agency began forfeiture proceedings against
the couple's house, bank accounts, their new truck and a boat.

On June 18, 1993, nearly two years after Operation Green Merchant had
arrived in Georgia, Gary, Steve and Joanne were arrested on federal drug
conspiracy charges.

The Southern Lights investigation had uncovered, all told, more than 100
small, hemp-growing operations across north Georgia, and resulted in at
least 30 arrests. Which meant at least 30 potential prosecution
witnesses, who had already claimed many of the available drug-defense
attorneys in Atlanta by the time the Tuckers went shopping for legal
counsel.

Meeting by chance at a community gathering, Gary and Joanne were
introduced to Nancy Lord, a trial lawyer and outspoken Libertarian
activist who had been that party's 1992 vice-presidential candidate.

With only one major drug case on her resume, Lord had just moved to
Atlanta to practice under the tutelage of prominent defense attorney
Tony Axam. Lord and Axam signed on to separately represent Joanne and
Gary, respectively. An acquaintance of Lord's was hired for Steve.

>From the beginning, Lord was passionate about her assignment, appearing
at press conferences and local forums to protest the Big Brother
tactics of the federal drug war and attack the flimsiness of the
government's case against the Tucker family.

Certainly, to the layperson, it would have appeared weak. Despite 18
months of constant surveillance, boxes of confiscated documents, dozens
of confidential informants and the DEA's own terrified mole managing the
store, the agency had failed to come up with any physical evidence
linking Gary to his customers' crops.

No marijuana -- growing or dime-bagged -- was found in Southern Lights,
Gary's house or Steve's apartment. No paper trail of drug deals. No
incriminating messages. No videotaped handoffs of suspicious packages.
No blurry photos of Gary inspecting a customer's harvest. No secretly
recorded advice on the finer points of cultivating Maui Wowie.

After a $1 million investigation, the only tangible exhibits the feds
had to show the jury were a set of precision scales that could have
been used to weigh leafy contraband, and an old pipe that Gary and
Joanne readily acknowledged they had used for smoking pot.

The government's sole weapon seemed to be a lengthy list of freshly
indicted, former Southern Lights customers desperate to prove themselves
useful enough on the witness stand for prosecutors to let them off
lightly.

The Tuckers and Lord, however, failed to fully appreciate that federal
conspiracy law is far less concerned with what you did than with what
you knew.

"Conspiracy law has been the darling of federal prosecutors since the
1930s, because you don't need direct evidence to score a conviction,"
explains Axam, now recognized as one of Georgia's top death-penalty
lawyers. "The reason they use it is because they may have no hard,
physical evidence, but with conspiracy, they can bring in hearsay,
rumor, innuendo."

Indeed, it's tough to imagine how anyone gets acquitted, considering the
standard description of conspiracy law given to federal juries: "The
fact that a defendant's acts appear not to be illegal when viewed in
isolation does not bar his conviction. An act innocent in nature and of
no danger to the victim or society suffices if it furthers the criminal
venture."

Lord, who now specializes in patent law and FDA drug approval at her
solo practice outside Las Vegas, admits she underestimated the
far-reaching power of conspiracy law. "I was shocked that this little
evidence could send someone up for 10 years," she says.

Still, why were prosecutors willing to let admitted pot-growers and
convicted drug dealers off easy so they could nail a tax-paying
businessman who hadn't been caught with any grass?

Doris Gore is convinced there was an element of vengeance in the DEA's
pursuit of her sons because they had refused to roll over, to name
names, to cop a plea. "They hated Gary because he wouldn't do what they
said," she says.

She may be on to something. During the trial, Garfield Hammonds, then
the Southeast's top DEA official, announced to the press that Gary was
no mere entrepreneur: "He's a bum, he's a parasite, he's a master of
deceit, he's a marijuana czar." Hammonds, who now sits on the state
Board of Pardons and Parole, didn't return a CL phone call.

It didn't help that Joanne had followed Lord's lead in publicly baiting
her accusers whenever the chance arose. "My husband is a political POW,"
she told one reporter. "We're fighting a political war, not a drug war."

Steve Tucker still believes he and Joanne were charged primarily as
added leverage against Gary. When they wouldn't give him up, the
government simply steamrolled over them as well.

Axam, who's since represented such high-profile defendants as Ray Lewis
and Jamil Al-Amin, won't discuss the particulars of the Tuckers'
defense, but he recalls vividly the feds' take-no-prisoners
determination.

"The government had a clear policy that it didn't want hydroponics
stores in business," he says. "If it looks long and hard enough at any
industry it doesn't like, it can find those connections."

Scheduled to begin in federal court in November 1993, United States v.
Gary Tucker et al got off to a spectacularly inauspicious start.

On the morning of jury selection, activists with the Fully Informed Jury
Association -- a radical libertarian group that believes juries should
be empowered to dismiss charges and reject unjust laws -- were handing
out flyers to everyone entering the Russell Federal Building,
effectively disqualifying an entire day's jury pool for the Northern
District of Georgia.

When Chief Judge William O'Kelly, who was to preside over the trial, was
told Lord had been seen outside exchanging pleasantries with one of the
activists, he was livid. Their courtroom relationship went downhill from
there.

Resuming the first week of January 1994, the trial lasted four days.
Assistant U.S. Attorney James Harper oversaw a parade of a dozen or so
nervous plea-bargain witnesses, some of whom testified that Gary, and
to a lesser extent, Steve and Joanne, had given them hemp-growing tips.
Several claimed Gary had bought pot from them or traded hydroponic
equipment for high-end herb. One said he'd glimpsed a freezer crammed
with weed in the couple's garage. Another said Gary offered to look
after his buds while he was out of town. A couple said Gary had
privately confirmed that the vast majority of his customers were
breaking the law.

The defense, spearheaded by Lord, scored too few points to overcome the
damage. One witness didn't believe the Tuckers had done anything
illegal. Another recalled bragging about his hemp garden, only to have
Gary tell him to get rid of it. Several acknowledged hoping their
testimony would spare them prison time.

One former Southern Lights customer, a 66-year-old ex-con we'll call
"Bob" (who spoke to CL on condition he not be named), now says DEA
agents tried to coax him into claiming the Tuckers were growing pot at
their house, but stopped short of asking him to lie.

"'You help us and we'll help you,' is how they put it," he explains.

When asked to wear a wire into the store, Bob agreed -- then fled the
state rather than aid an investigation he believed was intent on
"railroading" the business owners.

Even though he eventually testified after police tracked him down, Bob
received a four-year sentence, rather than the 18-month stretch he'd
initially been offered.

"I disappointed [prosecutors] because I didn't say what they wanted me
to," he says. "To my knowledge, the Tuckers didn't do anything other
than sell chemicals and lights -- except for indulging."

Steve's own years behind bars have taught him not to be shocked at what
someone might say on the witness stand.

"I was in prison with people who'd swear their own mother was Hitler if
it would help them," he says, shaking his head. "I'll never have another
close friend. I'll never be able to trust anyone that way, now that I've
seen what people will do to protect their freedom."

While he concedes that he can't speak for his brother's actions, Steve
insists he never offered growing advice or swapped weed with customers
-- although he shared a joint on occasion.

Plain-spoken to the point of abrasive, Nancy Lord continued to criticize
the DEA, pointedly suggesting that witnesses had been coerced to lie.

When the judge warned her at one point that Agent McLaughlin wasn't the
one on trial, she shot back: "He should be." O'Kelly fumed that he was
citing her for contempt. "If I go to jail, I go to jail," she shrugged.

"Nancy had some balls," Steve recalls, laughing. "She stood up to that
judge."

But Lord now reflects that her confrontational style didn't serve her
clients well, a point made painfully clear when O'Kelly told her he
believed Joanne likely would have been acquitted if she'd been defended
in a more professional manner.

"My problem was, I was too angry," Lord says. "I wanted to make a
political statement -- to argue against the drug war -- and I thought
the jury would go along with me. Now, I'd probably urge the Tuckers to
re-examine taking a plea agreement."

The trial's low point came when Joanne took the stand in her own
defense. The same woman who'd given tough-talking speeches defending
her family and denouncing government scare tactics suddenly sounded
uncertain and evasive when confronted by prosecutors.

"Joanne fell apart on the stand," Lord says. "It really was sad to
watch."

Despite widespread criticism of the nation's ongoing War on Drugs,
there's at least one battle Uncle Sam has convincingly won, depending
on your definition of victory.

First taking effect in 1989, mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines --
combined with the elimination of federal parole -- ensure that even the
most casual, recreational drug-user can be kept off his subdivision
streets for many long years while paying his debt to society -- and
there's not a damn thing any bleeding-heart federal judge can do about
it.

Supposedly intended to iron out the sentencing inconsistencies between
various district courts, mandatory minimums instead have only magnified
the racial disparity of the prison population. More than 43 percent of
all U.S. prison inmates are black males, and blacks outnumber whites in
prison by a margin of more than 5-to-4, according to Department of
Justice statistics released in July.

Bruce Harvey, Georgia's leading drug defense attorney, considers
mandatory-minimum sentencing to be part of a collection of immoral
federal laws whose combined impact is "nothing more than political
genocide on a whole group of people -- and it's getting worse."

Because a federal drug offender's punishment now is effectively
determined by the charges rather than a judge's experienced sense of
justice, sentencing power lies in the hands of prosecutor, where it's
frequently wielded to compel a defendant to make some agent's job
easier.

Before the trial began, says Steve: "I was offered 24 months instead of
10 years if I'd testify against Gary. When I said no, they asked me to
testify against Joanne. I mean, my brother or my brother's wife, what's
the difference?"

Even after the jury had returned guilty verdicts against all three
Tuckers, the prosecutors offered Steve one last deal: Give up the names
of any pot-growers who had escaped their dragnet and get off with only
two years.

"I figure I'm a man, I make my own decisions, and I'm not going to tear
someone else down to spare myself some time," he says. "I said, 'I'll do
my 10 years.'"

The way the Tuckers arrived at that sentencing threshold, however,
involved a stunning use of statutory sleight-of-hand.

When the DEA would bust a pot farm, each plant -- from the tiniest
seedling up to mature bushes in full flower -- would count as one kilo
of hemp. Then the agents would break out the calculators: Assume an
annual yield of five crops, multiply by the projected time the suspect
had been growing, add in the number of actual plants confiscated,
convert to kilos and voila!, all equaling one serious prison sentence.

In the Southern Lights case, for instance, one customer was caught
growing 80 actual plants, which, after a run-in with the DEA's
conversion chart, had blossomed into an "estimated" 1,200 plants,
speaking of manufacturing marijuana.

The Tuckers had been charged in relation to 1,000 kilos -- exactly the
amount needed to trigger a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years --
which consisted mostly of theoretical weed. Gary received an additional
six years for masterminding the criminal enterprise.

"To this day, we don't know whose plants we were charged with," Steve
says. Not that it mattered. Whoever they belonged to, there were plenty
where those came from.

As Agent McLaughlin explained to the judge: "I stopped computing at
16,000 plants."

The one bright spot in the trial seemed to be the jury's decision to
deny the federal forfeiture of Gary and Joanne's house, presumably
because of the absence of evidence that it was paid for with drug money.

Nancy Lord says the government's final dirty trick came when the DEA
agreed to drop its claim to the property -- only to have the home seized
by the state.

Steve and Gary's introduction to Club Fed was a temporary stay --
mingling with some of the same guys who'd snitched on them -- at the
minimum-security prison camp next to the notorious Atlanta Federal
Penitentiary.

"What you see in the movies about prisons is pretty much true about the
Atlanta Pen," Steve says.

After a few months, they were transferred to Alabama, a trip Steve
recalls with disbelief: "When I left the Atlanta Prison Camp, they gave
me $75 and a set of street clothes. I took a cab, a bus and another
cab, and reported to my new prison. If they could trust me to do that,
obviously, I'm not the kind of guy who needs to be in prison."

Even as they settled into the cell they shared at Talladega Federal
Correctional Institute, Gary and Steve's convictions were being
condemned in newsletters and described in magazine articles, discussed
at political forums and featured in a CNN special.

The family was the subject of a chapter in the 1998 book Shattered
Lives: Portraits From America's Drug War. Co-author Mikki Norris of El
Cerrito, Calif., says the Tuckers' case was one of the more disturbing
she studied.

"It made me very paranoid to think that you could be convicted of
completing a drug transaction without even knowing it," she says.

As the months and then years wore on, the media furor eventually died
down and the brothers fell into the mind-numbing routine of prison
life. To keep busy, Steve edited the inmate-produced newspaper, "Prose
and Cons," and counted out his time: 54 days off each year
automatically for good behavior, a year off for completing a voluntary
drug-rehab course.

"You work, you eat, you read -- prison's a lot like a small town," he
says. "I read over 600 novels, mostly psycho-thrillers, and I wrote a
few, too."

But it wasn't all dull. In October 1995, much of the federal inmate
population was following the progress of a congressional bill to reduce
the penalties for crack possession -- retroactively, for many already
serving time.

One morning, news came that the bill had failed; a foreboding silence
fell over the prison the rest of the day, Steve recalls. That evening,
he says, word spread throughout the cafeteria that a California prison
was rioting in protest of the vote in Washington. A few minutes later,
the whole place erupted.

"We feared for our lives that night," Steve says. "The inmates tore that
prison to hell. It was really harrowing."

Later, they found out the rumor about the California prison had been a
hoax. Instead, it was the Talladega riot -- which caused $3 million in
damages and left several buildings burned -- that had touched off at
least three similar episodes in other states.

That same year, the U.S. Sentencing Commission downgraded the conversion
weight for a marijuana plant from 1 kilo to 100 grams. Gary petitioned
to have his sentence reduced accordingly, but Steve didn't file his own
request out of concern it might somehow hurt his brother's chances.

Finally, in 1998, Judge O'Kelly reduced Gary's sentence to 10 years. In
the end, it didn't make any difference.

Last December, five days after Steve was released from the halfway house
where he'd spent the last few months of his sentence, Gary died of
cancer at Emory Hospital.

He had been sick for a nearly a year, but prison officials refused to
take his illness seriously until it was too late, his mother says.

"They'd give him an aspirin and send him back to his cell until he'd
pass out and then they'd take him to the hospital," Gore says.

Steve was able to see Gary toward the end, but Joanne -- who'd been
transferred from a Connecticut woman's prison to a Macon halfway house
-- wasn't allowed to visit her husband the week before he died.

The diagnosis was non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a cancer closely associated
with exposure to Agent Orange, the deadly herbicide used in Vietnam. It
would seem Gary's government had succeeded in killing him after all.

Even though his prison sentence has been served and he's returned to his
old job, Steve Tucker wouldn't call himself a free man. Not when he has
to call in every morning for the next four years so a recorded message
can tell him whether he's been randomly selected to pee in a cup that
day. Not since he had to give up his lifelong pastime of hunting
because he can never again hold a gun. Not after he's seen politicians
get elected on the promise to pass more draconian drug laws, and
knowing he's forever lost his right to vote.

For the first time in nearly a decade, Steve brought his son and
daughter, in their mid-teens, to spend Thanksgiving with his mother in
Cochran, a half-hour south of Macon. He was required to seek written
approval from his probation officer weeks in advance of the visit.

"When I got out, I had to learn my way around Atlanta again, but I went
back to work like I'd never left; there was no adjustment problem," he
says. "The hardest part is the probation, because you have to get
permission to do just about everything."

In prison, Steve met guys who told him they had violated their probation
on purpose because another 16 months in the big house was better than
three more years of having people always looking over your shoulder,
waiting for you to fuck up.

The thing about federal prison that made the biggest impression on Steve
was how many inmates were much like himself: small-time, non-violent
offenders serving big-time sentences for reasons that made little sense.

"Even if I was guilty, 10 years seems excessive when there were bank
robbers who were in there for two or three years, and I got 10 years for
selling light bulbs," he says, his voice rising as if framing a
question.

"This drug war forced two little kids to grow up without their dad and
my ex-wife to go without child-support for eight years, and for what?"
he continues. "I'm not saying I'm above the law, but I know in my heart
I'm not the type of person who needed to be in prison."

And yet, once there, the outrageousness of his circumstances blended
into a background of statistics: He simply became another of the
anonymous drug offenders who make up 57 percent of all federal inmates.

If anything, the War on Drugs has only built momentum through the
political backing of such powerful interest groups as prison guard
unions; the billion-dollar drug-testing industry; private prison
construction and management companies; and, of course, the DEA, which
commands a $1.8-billion budget and has, in the past 30 years, more than
tripled the number of special agents on its payroll.

Over the last decade, drug convictions have accounted for more than 80
percent of the growth of the federal prison population, so it's hardly
surprising that, as the drug war swirled outside, amassing new victims,
Steve Tucker was essentially forgotten.

His sister-in-law, Joanne, now remarried and relocated, wants to forget
as well. Declining to be interviewed, she explains: "Digging up
something from 10 years ago isn't going to help anything now."

Trying to piece together a ruined life takes time, but there's a freedom
that comes with starting over, and Steve is hoping to write his own
second act.

He's looking for a literary agent to publish one of the novels he wrote
in prison, a mystery set in a town modeled loosely on Cochran. As they
say, you write what you know.

"People ask me if I'm going to write about everything I've been through,
but I don't think so," he says wistfully. "Who wants to read about some
guy who got busted for pot?"

)1996-2006 Creative Loafing Media - All Rights Reserved




More information about the NYTr mailing list