[NYTr] NH's North Should Seek Statehood; Ron Paul is New Hampshire

[All the News That Doesn't Fit]

Quigley Blog - Oct 14, 2007
http://quigleyblog.blogspot.com/

NH Northern Counties Should Seek Statehood Status: Ron Paul is NH

By Bernie Quigley for The Free Market News Network on 10/14/07

Senator Clinton is way ahead in New Hampshire. The Marist College
Institute for Public Opinion has her at 40%. Her closest rival is at 20
percent. If she wins the state, the northern counties of New Hampshire
should begin to call for separate statehood status.

New Hampshire is Ron Paul. You see it everywhere – on oversized signs
in Warren, Woodsville and Lisbon, in the local papers and at state
fairs. He has taken the imagination of the Live Free or Die state and
more than anyone in today’s Presidential race he represents the
instincts, ethic and the mythic tradition of independence that brought
people to like him up here as we once liked John McCain and others to
rich for the mainstream federalist blood.

New Hampshire is today the most Jeffersonian of states in a nation of
mass-minded and manipulated corporate consumers which have forgotten
what Jefferson awakened in the world. We wear independence on our
license plates and when a foreign leader like the newly elected Nicolas
Sarcozy, intent on changing France’s destiny, wants to show a flinty
independence, his first symbolic act it to come to our cold lakes to
bask. We even have a movie nowadays with Bruce Willis busting thing up
under the anthem of our state motto.

But right now Ron Paul is New Hampshire.

It may seem odd that this same environment would want to send Hillary
Clinton – who seems on closer inspection more a Mrs. Harry Truman than
a Mrs. Clinton – the apogee of middle mind; middle age; middle
management mid’lin – to the highest numbers in the polls.

It is simple demographics. The tax rate up here is an attraction to
outsiders who are not particularly independent of spirit but simply
want to avoid responsibility. That is, they want cradle to grave
federal care same as in Massachusetts and pre-Sarcozy France, but want
others to pay the bill. (A condition of the Mid’lin Class: neither
master nor man and woman, but mid’lin – they want to live like the Eloi
and the royals of 17th century France, but still have the attitudes of
the proletariat ancestors). These people are generally from the
industrial top of Massachusetts and have just in recent times moved
across the border.

The trouble is, they have brought Massachusetts with them.

New Hampshire still has the right stuff which gave it its reputation,
but now it is invariably overwhelmed by the mass market corporate
culture which has moved across to the bottom of the state.

If we could have a primary of just us in the northern New Hampshire
counties – which is most of the state and mostly mountains - and
exclude the few counties of the Massachusetts people in the flatland
south – the Massachusetts “pseudo states” or economic colonies - we
could once again express our native independence and Ron Paul would
very well win the state.

We have seen this new condition of voting in recent elections and it
was illustrated most vividly in ’04 at the frozen top of the state,
Dixville Notch, which might be considered essence of New Hampshire,
when Wes Clark won up to 80 percent of the vote. And as with Ron Paul
today, large Wes Clark signs dotted the northern landscape (sometimes
to the distress of the Massachusetts people who would if they could,
zone their property to outlaw pick up trucks . . . they also feel the
big political signs benighted their neighborhoods). But at the end of
the day it was all John Kerry, same as in Massachusetts.

If Senator Clinton or one of those milquetoast others of both parties
wins this state the northern counties above industrialized Manchester
on the southern tip should seek independent state status – call that
Free State status – to restore our independence of mind and influence.
And while we are traveling there we might call for a state Constitution
Convention to retool our old state Constitution. Consider the new with
Jefferson in mind and Madison, and find a state Constitution to fit the
times and temperament.

After we ditched the Massachusetts people in the south we might for
example specify in our new state Constitution that before the U.S.
President can send New Hampshire men and women to war against China,
Russia, all of Islam and the other of its now so many enemies (I added
these up using the CIA Factbook and it comes to at least 2.5 billion
people against the 301 million in the U.S.; but then we have
Blackwater), she would need permission from the New Hampshire Governor.
And when President Hillary attempts to reestablish the draft to show
her manlies, as she is certain to do under the advice of the Clinton
Cajun Cartel which keeps her on her populist and nostalgico course, she
would need our permission to press into service from our state.

If this came about the northern counties should be called New
Hampshire. We would not be creating a new state, we would only be
restoring that which we once were and finding again that which we have
lost or had taken away from us. The southern counties could be called
North Massachusetts. But Little Massachusetts would be better. We used
to call small towns which resembled big towns “little” in old New
England, and the littles always do best to follow Mother.