[NYTr] Views on Sex-Ed Divide Democratic, GOP Candidates

All the News That Doesn't Fit nytr at blythe-systems.com
Mon Nov 26 15:00:43 EST 2007


Womens eNews - Nov 26, 2007
http://www.womensenews.org


Views on Sex-Ed Divide Democratic, GOP Candidates

By Alison Bowen

(WOMENSENEWS)--An end to abstinence-only sex education was at the top
of the list when 600 self-described feminists met in New York recently
to rally their ranks and craft a platform for U.S. presidential
lobbying.

Abstinence-only--for which President Bush proposes a 2008 budget of
$204 million--has avid supporters and wary detractors, who want to find
a more comprehensive way to present sex education.

In March, three members of Congress introduced a bill to authorize
federal funds for states' comprehensive sex education that offers menu
of options from abstinence to contraception and abortion. The
Responsible Education About Life Act--or the REAL Act as the bill is
known--was sponsored by Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, D-N.J.; Rep. Barbara
Lee, D-Calif.; and Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn.

The following month a congressional study found that abstinence-only
education--which emphasizes chastity, or abstaining from sex, as the
best practice for teens--did not significantly delay their decisions
whether to have sex.

Over a dozen states have dodged abstinence-only curricula for their
schools by declining the funds that mandate it.

On Nov. 14 Virginia became the latest when Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's
proposed budget eliminated the $275,000 matching grant that is part of
the federal funding.

Plenty of GOP boosters remain on Capitol Hill, however.

In the wake of President Bush's Oct. 3 veto of the State Children's
Health Insurance Program--the low-cost health insurance for families
who don't qualify for Medicaid but can't afford private insurance--some
Democratic advocates of SCHIP tried to sweeten it for Republicans by
attaching a $28 million increase in abstinence funding. That effort
failed, but it showed the extent to which abstinence funding is viewed
as a potent bipartisan bargaining.

Philosophical Tug of War

For nearly a decade, since Bush increased funding for abstinence
programs that were by and large introduced during Bill Clinton's
administration, the philosophical struggle over sex education has been
between an abstinence-only approach and comprehensive sex-ed.

Out of that tug of war, compromisers have for a couple of years been
promoting a middle way: "abstinence-plus," which mentions abstinence
within a broader discussion of safe sex.

Programs combining both abstinence and contraception were most
effective, a Nov. 7 study by the Washington-based National Campaign to
Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy reported, echoing Virginia Gov.
Kaine's reasons for declining abstinence-only funding.

But abstinence-plus by no means pleases everyone.

In 2004 the Heritage Foundation, the Washington think tank, warned that
abstinence instruction comprises only about 5 percent of
abstinence-plus curricula. In authentic abstinence curricula, that
figure should be 54 percent, the report said.

Abstinence advocates argue that studies pinpointing abstinence-only
education as a failure surveyed children too young to understand the
message and didn't reach a large enough sample of abstinence programs.

Few of the presidential candidates have said much yet about any of
this, and few in the news media have asked on the campaign trail.

Here's what can be said about their positions so far.

Democrats

* Joe Biden supports "age-appropriate" and comprehensive sex education
but the Delaware senator has also voted to fund abstinence programs.

* Hillary Clinton has favored abstinence-plus for a decade. In 1996 as
first lady she helped launch the teen pregnancy campaign, which has a
goal of reducing teen pregnancy by one-third by 2015 through
comprehensive education and awareness. Ten years later, as New York
senator, she introduced the Prevention First Act, which would have
allocated $100 million for family planning services in an effort to
curb teen pregnancy.

* Chris Dodd's Web site says the Connecticut senator is "appalled" by
the Bush administration's abstinence-only programs.

* John Edwards promotes comprehensive sex education according to his
Web site. The former North Carolina senator's campaign did not return
phone calls.

* Mike Gravel, former senator from Alaska, said he favored
comprehensive sex education in a questionnaire he returned to the
Washington-based Human Rights Campaign, a civil rights group.

* Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich is the only presidential candidate who is a
co-sponsor of the Responsible Education About Life Act that emphasizes
comprehensive programs.

* Illinois Sen. Barack Obama introduced the Communities of Color Teen
Pregnancy Prevention Act of 2007 in Illinois. He respects abstinence as
a choice but also advocates age-appropriate comprehensive sex education.

* New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson favors abstinence-plus.

Republicans

* Rudi Giuliani, the only Republican candidate still waffling about his
pro-choice stance, avoids the topic. He talks about increasing
adoptions and decreasing abortions but is mum on sex education. As New
York City mayor for eight years, he presided over a major free condom
distribution campaign that included public schools. A campaign
spokesperson says Giuliani's stance can be compared to what he says
about education in general: "The enforcer of standards should . . . be
the parent."

* John McCain promotes abstinence-only programs but the Arizona senator
has previously promoted comprehensive sex education.

* Mitt Romney promoted abstinence education in Massachusetts classrooms
as governor of that state from 2003 to 2007. Romney mentioned this in
the May South Carolina debates to show his credentials as a "clear and
consistent conservative." Alex Burgos, a campaign staffer, said Romney
believes schools should "promote abstinence as part of their health
curriculum and teach that marriage comes before babies." Romney,
however, checked a box saying he supported comprehensive sex education
in a 2002 Planned Parenthood candidate survey.

* Fred Thompson, former Tennessee senator, backs abstinence education.

* Duncan Hunter, California representative, favors "equal emphasis" on
abstinence. He wants to give abstinence the same amount of teaching as
the dangers of sexually transmitted diseases.

* Mike Huckabee favors abstinence-only and opposes abstinence-plus. In
response to a question asking whether his religious beliefs would allow
him to support AIDS prevention in Africa that might include
contraception, the Arkansas governor compared it with domestic violence
and said compromising on either issue is not an option. "We don't say
that a little domestic violence is OK, just cut it down a little, just
don't hit quite as hard," says the former Arkansas governor. "We say
it's wrong."

* Ron Paul, the Texas representative, favors abstinence-only programs.

* Tom Tancredo, the Colorado representative, favors abstinence-only
programs.

[lison Bowen is a New York City-based journalist covering the 2008
campaign. Her work also appears in the New York Daily News.]

For more information:

Human Rights Campaign, Candidate questionnaire on LGBT issues: -
http://www.hrc.org/news/5207.htm

National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy: -
http://www.teenpregnancy.org/

Mathematica Policy Research, Abstinence education report, April 2007 -
[PDF format]: -
http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/impactabstinence.pdf


Copyright 2007 Women's eNews.


More information about the NYTr mailing list